<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: USG and MRI for IBD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.catscanman.net/blog/2009/03/usg-and-mri-for-ibd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.catscanman.net/blog/2009/03/usg-and-mri-for-ibd/</link>
	<description>random noise, nebulous views &#038; artifacts</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 09:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peng</title>
		<link>http://www.catscanman.net/blog/2009/03/usg-and-mri-for-ibd/comment-page-1/#comment-47553</link>
		<dc:creator>Peng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catscanman.net/blog/?p=1219#comment-47553</guid>
		<description>I agree, but we so often have negative barium follow-through studies for patients with vague symptoms that I have been trying to figure out whether a careful ultrasound would suffice in some cases, given that you can often see bowel wall thickening on US.

On a related topic I thought it was interesting that in this recent article the authors found no significant difference in sensitivity between CT, MT or BaFT for detection of terminal ileitis.
http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/2513081184v1

Peng</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, but we so often have negative barium follow-through studies for patients with vague symptoms that I have been trying to figure out whether a careful ultrasound would suffice in some cases, given that you can often see bowel wall thickening on US.</p>
<p>On a related topic I thought it was interesting that in this recent article the authors found no significant difference in sensitivity between CT, MT or BaFT for detection of terminal ileitis.<br />
<a href="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/2513081184v1" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/2513081184v1');" rel="nofollow">http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/2513081184v1</a></p>
<p>Peng</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijay</title>
		<link>http://www.catscanman.net/blog/2009/03/usg-and-mri-for-ibd/comment-page-1/#comment-47537</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catscanman.net/blog/?p=1219#comment-47537</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Dr. Peng.

The problem with utlrasound is not just that it's technically demanding. Even the most proficient sonographer would never be sure if s/he picked up all the findings in a given case however optimal be the patient. CT (and MRI, with reservations) give an operator and modality independent full picture view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Dr. Peng.</p>
<p>The problem with utlrasound is not just that it&#8217;s technically demanding. Even the most proficient sonographer would never be sure if s/he picked up all the findings in a given case however optimal be the patient. CT (and MRI, with reservations) give an operator and modality independent full picture view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peng</title>
		<link>http://www.catscanman.net/blog/2009/03/usg-and-mri-for-ibd/comment-page-1/#comment-47536</link>
		<dc:creator>Peng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catscanman.net/blog/?p=1219#comment-47536</guid>
		<description>I've been thinking about this one. If ultrasound is a good but technically demanding examination for IBD , perhaps it's worth spending time learning to do it well. It's nicer and cheaper for the patient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking about this one. If ultrasound is a good but technically demanding examination for IBD , perhaps it&#8217;s worth spending time learning to do it well. It&#8217;s nicer and cheaper for the patient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

