CT Colonography May Yet Challenge Colonoscopy
Published by Vijay April 21st, 2009 in MDCT, News, Radiology…
via Medscape & ACR CT Colonography May Yet Challenge Colonoscopy.
Although CT colonography (CTC) is a promising technique that has good sensitivity for detecting larger colon polyps and is less invasive than colonoscopy, it does not appear to be cost effective for average-risk colorectal cancer screening. However, used in the right circumstances, the CT technique could prove to be economically viable, according to US and Dutch researchers. They estimated the threshold costs for which CTC would be an economical alternative to colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. The results “support the effectiveness of CTC for colorectal cancer screening,” investigator Dr. Ann Graham Zauber told Reuters Health, “but also show that to be cost effective as well, the CTC costs could not be more than 43% of that for optical colonoscopy,” for similar levels of adherence.
In the March issue of the International Journal of Cancer, Dr. Zauber of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, and colleagues note that the costs of CTC have not been well established. To help do so, they estimated costs and life years gained in patients aged 50 to 80 years and compared these with the results of colonoscopy under various strategies. The model employed looked at screening intervals of 5, 10, 15 and 20 years. The researchers calculated that for the CTC approach to do as well as optical colonoscopy every 10 years, it should be offered every 5 years and suspected polyps of 6 mm or more should be referred for colonoscopy.
To be cost effective in this setting, they estimate that costs should not be greater than 43% of those of colonoscopy. However, if adherence to CTC were 25% greater than that with colonoscopy, perhaps because of the possible absence of cathartic preparation, then the threshold cost could rise to 71% of the optical technique and still be cost effective. Because of this potential development and because CTC reading appears less time consuming, the researchers conclude that achieving such cost levels appears to be possible.
…
What “absence of cathartic preparation” are they talking about? The pre-procedure preparation for CT Colonography is as rigorous as for optical Colonoscopy!
3 Responses to “CT Colonography May Yet Challenge Colonoscopy”
- 1 Pingback on Apr 23rd, 2009 at 3:28 pm














IMO, a colonoscopy has dual advantages:
1. Screening
2. Tissue biopsy
So these pts. who go for CT colonography will need a 2nd procedure to get a tissue sample - this will definately increase the costs as well as delay the treatment and the pt. has to go undergo colonic preparation for a 2nd time.
CT colonography wld. be false economy, IMO. Unless of course you are pretty sure that the pt. is not going to develop polyps!
This is exactly, Penny wise but pound foolish!
Thanks for the comments Abhishek.
I don’t know if there’s sufficient evidence or justification for using CT Colonography as a screening tool.
We don’t use it as a screening tool here in our population, who aren’t prone for premalignant familial polyposis. It’s more a non-invasive diagnostic alternative.